Alpha heroes
There's a lot of talk about alpha heroes in romance novels.
They are often accused of being cruel, arrogant, haughty, and downright nasty -- until, of course, they understand how wrong they were about the heroine and then have a metanoia sort of conversion somewhere around page 186.
Far be it from me to deny they can exist. Though I wouldn't necessarily call all the men who behave like tha
t "heroes."
But I suppose really, it depends on what your fantasy is. If you like those guys described above, that's what works for you.
It doesn't work for me.
My alpha hero doesn't do 'cruel.' And he doesn't do 'mean' or even 'downright nasty.' Arrogant, yes. Haughty, sometimes. Silently judgmental? He can.
Oh, yes, he can. (Ask Seb). He can even be judgmental out loud.
He can also be wrong. (No surprise there).
But when he is, he has to be honorably wrong.
If he's going to make judgments, he's got to have a believable reason for it. He's got to have a backstory that predisposes him toward such a belief. He's got to think he has evidence for it. And he's got to be believing it in service to a higher good.
He doesn't jump to conclusions just because he's the hero -- especially wrong ones -- just so he can repent in the end.
And if he's a McAllister hero, even if he believes the worst, he doesn't do anything that would make the heroine rightfully hate him. If he did that would simply prove he has no right to be her hero.
I'm spending a lot of time thinking about this because I am dealing with that issue in Seb's book.
I'm also thinking about it because I just re-read Jane Donnelly's story The Man Outside. Last Thursday on the Pink Heart Society blog, I wrote about Jane's books and, especially, her heroes.
To do so, I got a stack of JD's keepers off my shelf and began to re-read them. Several of them have heroes who believe the worst of the heroine. Not always -- not in my favorite, Behind a Closed Door, in which the heroine believes the worst of the hero.
But in The Man Outside, Piers Hargreaves gradually opens up to Polly's interest and then learns the truth -- but not the whole truth -- that she was dared to try to reach him. The implication is that her interest is a sham, that she is manipulative and doesn't care for him at all.
He could react cruelly. He could do his best to destroy her because he does have all the power and influence an alpha hero should have.
But he also has the honor that allows him to absorb the pain, and the intelligence to look for the root cause of it (that would be the jealo
us other man who has told him this 'truth'), and to recognize who is really telling the truth.
He doesn't displace his anger. He does something constructive with it -- because that's the kind of man he is. And over the course of the story he has learned from Polly how to reach out to other people, how to risk his emotions, and ultimately how to demonstrate his love.
So when circumstances might allow him to be cruel, he is anything but. He is remote, he is standoffish, he is quiet and self-contained. But he is honorable. And because he loves Polly, he has a long range plan that will turn the tide his way.
As the end approaches and Polly fears all is lost, we readers trust that it's not.
We know that she has loved him well, that she has seen the man inside Piers Hargreaves -- and that her love has helped him find the means of expressing who he really is.
He is strong and steadfast, intelligent and powerful, relentless and singleminded in his pursuit of her. But he will do it in a way that proves to Polly he's every bit the man she believed he was -- an honorable man, a determined man, a commanding man with an inner core of gentleness that will never allow him to hurt the woman he loves.
For me that's a real alpha hero. It's the man I want to find inside Sebastian.
If you haven't read Jane Donnelly, seek her out. Discover that the alpha hero often gets a bad rap. He isn't at all what his detractors make him out to be.
They are often accused of being cruel, arrogant, haughty, and downright nasty -- until, of course, they understand how wrong they were about the heroine and then have a metanoia sort of conversion somewhere around page 186.
Far be it from me to deny they can exist. Though I wouldn't necessarily call all the men who behave like tha
t "heroes."But I suppose really, it depends on what your fantasy is. If you like those guys described above, that's what works for you.
It doesn't work for me.
My alpha hero doesn't do 'cruel.' And he doesn't do 'mean' or even 'downright nasty.' Arrogant, yes. Haughty, sometimes. Silently judgmental? He can.
Oh, yes, he can. (Ask Seb). He can even be judgmental out loud.
He can also be wrong. (No surprise there).
But when he is, he has to be honorably wrong.
If he's going to make judgments, he's got to have a believable reason for it. He's got to have a backstory that predisposes him toward such a belief. He's got to think he has evidence for it. And he's got to be believing it in service to a higher good.
He doesn't jump to conclusions just because he's the hero -- especially wrong ones -- just so he can repent in the end.
And if he's a McAllister hero, even if he believes the worst, he doesn't do anything that would make the heroine rightfully hate him. If he did that would simply prove he has no right to be her hero.
I'm spending a lot of time thinking about this because I am dealing with that issue in Seb's book.
I'm also thinking about it because I just re-read Jane Donnelly's story The Man Outside. Last Thursday on the Pink Heart Society blog, I wrote about Jane's books and, especially, her heroes.
To do so, I got a stack of JD's keepers off my shelf and began to re-read them. Several of them have heroes who believe the worst of the heroine. Not always -- not in my favorite, Behind a Closed Door, in which the heroine believes the worst of the hero.
But in The Man Outside, Piers Hargreaves gradually opens up to Polly's interest and then learns the truth -- but not the whole truth -- that she was dared to try to reach him. The implication is that her interest is a sham, that she is manipulative and doesn't care for him at all.
He could react cruelly. He could do his best to destroy her because he does have all the power and influence an alpha hero should have.
But he also has the honor that allows him to absorb the pain, and the intelligence to look for the root cause of it (that would be the jealo
us other man who has told him this 'truth'), and to recognize who is really telling the truth.He doesn't displace his anger. He does something constructive with it -- because that's the kind of man he is. And over the course of the story he has learned from Polly how to reach out to other people, how to risk his emotions, and ultimately how to demonstrate his love.
So when circumstances might allow him to be cruel, he is anything but. He is remote, he is standoffish, he is quiet and self-contained. But he is honorable. And because he loves Polly, he has a long range plan that will turn the tide his way.
As the end approaches and Polly fears all is lost, we readers trust that it's not.
We know that she has loved him well, that she has seen the man inside Piers Hargreaves -- and that her love has helped him find the means of expressing who he really is.
He is strong and steadfast, intelligent and powerful, relentless and singleminded in his pursuit of her. But he will do it in a way that proves to Polly he's every bit the man she believed he was -- an honorable man, a determined man, a commanding man with an inner core of gentleness that will never allow him to hurt the woman he loves.
For me that's a real alpha hero. It's the man I want to find inside Sebastian.
If you haven't read Jane Donnelly, seek her out. Discover that the alpha hero often gets a bad rap. He isn't at all what his detractors make him out to be.
Labels: Heroes, Jane Donnelly, recommended books, Sebastian
posted by Anne McAllister at 8:35 PM
4 comments
